If you want to determine how much an answer is worth, maybe this time Mira has a say.

I've been thinking, this new mechanism introduced by Mira @Mira_Network @MiraNetworkCN looks so familiar.
Later, flipping through memories, I suddenly remembered, do you 90s kids still remember "One vs. One"?
I don't know if the Mira @Mira_Network project team is a loyal fan of this program, but the gameplay really feels a bit similar: a quiz for the whole audience, everyone has one vote, and only those who answer correctly qualify for the prize. If you choose correctly, of course, you have a lot of contestants behind you, and you will share the rewards.
If you answer incorrectly, then just wait to be OUT.
Now it looks a lot like Mira @Mira_Network
Let me start from here.

____📑____📑____📑____📑____📑____📑____

"What Mira does is to make AI speak responsibly."

What AI says is verified by someone.
Who decides right or wrong? It's not a single model that has the final say, nor is it Mira @Mira_Network making the decision alone.
It requires that the answers between validators be similar and close to each other in order to pass.
Under the new mechanism, if you stake, submit answers, and they are highly consistent with others, it shows that you are not talking nonsense, and rewards should be given accordingly.
If the answers are all over the place, the system will automatically mark them and deduct from your staking.
This rule is there, it's not about who Mira @Mira_Network trusts, it's about a group of people whose answers must match.

____📑____📑____📑____📑____📑____📑____

"Don't think you can just blend in; after a while, Mira @Mira_Network will naturally see through it."

If you guess the answers and fill them in randomly, you might get lucky and get away with it, but in the long run, you will definitely be found out.
Mira @Mira_Network focuses on your overall performance in submitting answers, not just whether one question is right or wrong.
You always stand out from others, constantly jumping between right and wrong, or having a fluctuating answering style. The Mira system can detect these traces.
It is not about trusting anyone; it just observes objective laws.
Those who deceive for points and think about getting rewards will find no escape under this mechanism.

____📑____📑____📑____📑____📑____📑____

"Credibility, no longer based on feelings"

The authenticity of information has always been a question that no one can provide a unified answer to.
In the past, people relied on experts and platforms, then on models. Now, Mira @Mira_Network has proposed a new approach: let all users of the platform provide their own judgments, and as long as the results are reliable, it will be "close enough."
Now this is not an "abstract discussion"; it is about pricing "judgment behavior" using consensus and in the form of "deposits."
Slowly, everyone will get used to asking: Has this answer been verified by Mira @Mira_Network?

If verified, the answer already possesses "authority"; as for whether to believe it or not, it will no longer rely solely on "intuition".

____📑____📑____📑____📑____📑____📑____